Re^3: Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks

Re^3: Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR

by MidLifeXis (Monsignor)

on Nov 06, 2012 at 14:32 UTC ( #1002484=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR
in thread Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR

Ok, I can agree with that - I don't see how that changes the results. Changed to -3.

             Rate   IRS_map     Split IRS_while
IRS_map    9659/s        --      -26%      -28%
Split     13017/s       35%        --       -3%
IRS_while 13379/s       39%        3%        --
[download]

Considering that a lot of time is in I/O (open and readline), I wonder if the differences between our results are due more to I/O characteristics on our systems than to the algorithm itself.

--MidLifeXis

Comment on Re^3: Benchmark results \| localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR Download Code

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1002484]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)

As of 2017-06-24 16:53 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?