Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?

by tinita (Parson)
on Nov 19, 2012 at 13:27 UTC ( #1004535=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?
in thread Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?

don't you rather mean "exit with non-zero status"? zero means success. if you want to get an UNKNOWN report, you shouldn't return zero...


Comment on Re^2: Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?
Re^3: Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?
by Tux (Monsignor) on Nov 19, 2012 at 15:44 UTC

    No, the FAQ explicitly states:

    "How can I stop getting FAIL reports for missing libraries or other non-Perl dependencies?"

    If you have some special dependencies and don't want to get CPAN Testers reports if a dependency is not available, just exit from the Makefile.PL or Build.PL normally (with an exit code of 0) before the Makefile or Build file is created.

    exit 0 unless some_dependency_is_met ();
    

    Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn
Re^3: Silence CPAN Testers on obviously broken platforms?
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 19, 2012 at 15:46 UTC

    Nope, see http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes

    exit 0 means Makefile.PL succeeded , so rating could PASS ,FAIL, or UNKNOWN, depends on subsequent steps

    exit 2 means Makefile.PL died , so rating could be FAIL or NA depending on message

    exit 0 and 'Makefile' not created , rating is UNKNOWN

    exit 0 and 'Makefile' created, rating depends 'make' and 'make test' to determine PASS or FAIL

    Now at one point the cpan testers reporting service mixed up these conventions I described, started treating NA as FAIL and UNKNOWN as NA or some such mix of results (not important now)...

    So follow CPANAuthorNotes, to avoid FAIL, exit 0 to get UNKNOWN, or Devel::AssertOS to get NA

    UNKNOWN is safer than NA, cause some Win32 modules can run on linux, and some day they might all run on linux :)

    NA is like the faulty practice of parsing user-agent-string or testing browser version details to determine if the client supports cookies and ajax

    UNKNOWN is like trying to set a cookie to see if cookies are supported or checking if document.XMLHttpRequest is available to know if ajax is supported

      Excellent summary, that somehow derives a greater degree of clarity out of the CPAN Testers documentation than the documentation itself manages. This thread just got added to my Personal Nodelet. :)


      Dave

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1004535]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-04 01:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (57 votes), past polls