Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re: Why no one port perl5 to Parrot?

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Nov 27, 2012 at 05:56 UTC ( #1005795=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Why no one port perl5 to Parrot?

There are lots of hurdles that prevent porting of Perl 5 to a different backend than what it currently has, and Parrot in particular:

  • Perl 5 is not specified, but dictated by the current implementation
  • Perl 5 has some weird behavior in quite many places, and it's nigh impossible to reproduce the same behavior with a different implementation
  • XS. Do I need to say more?
  • Whenever you port a high-level language with as many quirks as Perl 5 has to a different runtime that wasn't specifically designed to support it, you get quite some runtime overhead, making the port slower than the C implementation, even if the new backend is faster in places.
  • Parrot still lacks the maturity that Perl 5 needs in lots of areas (IO, threads, performance).
  • Man power. Porting any non-trivial language to $anywhere is a huge effort, and needs hackers that stay committed over a long time, and invest vast amounts of time and energy.

While many folks agree that having Perl 5 on Parrot would be a nice thing, that alone simply isn't enough to make it happen.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005795]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-10-27 17:07 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (366 votes). Check out past polls.