Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why no one port perl5 to Parrot?

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Nov 27, 2012 at 05:56 UTC ( #1005795=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Why no one port perl5 to Parrot?

There are lots of hurdles that prevent porting of Perl 5 to a different backend than what it currently has, and Parrot in particular:

  • Perl 5 is not specified, but dictated by the current implementation
  • Perl 5 has some weird behavior in quite many places, and it's nigh impossible to reproduce the same behavior with a different implementation
  • XS. Do I need to say more?
  • Whenever you port a high-level language with as many quirks as Perl 5 has to a different runtime that wasn't specifically designed to support it, you get quite some runtime overhead, making the port slower than the C implementation, even if the new backend is faster in places.
  • Parrot still lacks the maturity that Perl 5 needs in lots of areas (IO, threads, performance).
  • Man power. Porting any non-trivial language to $anywhere is a huge effort, and needs hackers that stay committed over a long time, and invest vast amounts of time and energy.

While many folks agree that having Perl 5 on Parrot would be a nice thing, that alone simply isn't enough to make it happen.


Comment on Re: Why no one port perl5 to Parrot?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005795]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-25 12:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (160 votes), past polls