Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies. | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Perl allows package names consisting entirely of colonsby BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Nov 27, 2012 at 14:37 UTC ( [id://1005868]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I don't think this would not be a significant cost. Only the package declaration would have to be checked ... Is that true? What about?:
But also, once you start trying to validate this, what other additional rules are you going to add? Should we allow package _::_::_;? That said, I'm fine with Perl's "if you want to do something stupid, who are we to stop you?" philosophy. I also think that we should stick to that principle. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Obfuscated Code
|
|