Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Bug in App::FatPacker?

by Anonymous Monk
on Dec 05, 2012 at 17:29 UTC ( #1007341=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Bug in App::FatPacker?

Its a warning, ignore it, and proceed to the next fatpacker step


Comment on Re: Bug in App::FatPacker?
Re^2: Bug in App::FatPacker?
by elef (Friar) on Dec 05, 2012 at 17:58 UTC
    I can't continue; the packlists file generated is empty.

    I'm also getting BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/fatpack line 3, <> line 42.

      I bet it's gotta do with the annoying stance of "we don't need no steenkin' packlists!" found among Debian/Ubuntu but also some other distro folks. They simply throw out all packlists before creating a DEB package, so naturally FatPacker (and a bunch of other stuff like Module::Installed) can't work.

      On Gentoo I have to deal with the same policy but at least it's easy to fix yourself as everything is installed from source. On Debianish systems I'm afraid your only solution is to forego the package manager and keep your own CPAN-installed and -updated module tree.

        ^Sounds believable, but IIRC I installed my modules from the CPAN console, not from .deb files.

        Anyway, where are the .packlist files supposed to be? I have no /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2/auto/Spreadsheet/WriteExcel/.packlist; in fact, this folder is empty.

        The modules seem to be installed in /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2, but all I can see there are the .pm files; there is no .packlist. Is that the problem?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1007341]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-08-02 06:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Who would be the most fun to work for?















    Results (55 votes), past polls