Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: What are the files in a CPAN distribution?

by davido (Archbishop)
on Dec 19, 2012 at 19:18 UTC ( #1009610=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: What are the files in a CPAN distribution?
in thread What are the files in a CPAN distribution?

I agree with Corion here: I distribute MANIFEST.SKIP and think it's ok to distribute the /xt directory (or author-only tests). It just assures that if someone else wants to work on the module too, they've got everything that I would use if it were me working on it. It's easy enough to ensure that those ./xt tests only run if an environment variable is set, so at worst they're a little extra disk space, and at best they might help another contributor, bug-fixer, etc.


Dave


Comment on Re^2: What are the files in a CPAN distribution?
Download Code
Re^3: What are the files in a CPAN distribution?
by Tux (Monsignor) on Dec 19, 2012 at 19:47 UTC

    Most modules are no in some sort of reproducable VCS: svn or git, and most have some sort of preferred way of contributions (github).

    If people want to work on a module/distribution, a git clone or svn copy will get you *all* files, including those that - I agree with tobyink here - are listed in .gitignore and MANIFEST.SKIP. I hope at least that the authors are sane enough to have these two in the repository anyway.


    Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn

      I do keep modules in public Git repos, and in the module's POD point to that repo. Nevertheless, when someone looks for a distribution, they look to CPAN, and I try to provide the complete dist there. Anyway, the good thing about Perl is that TIMTOWTDI. :)


      Dave

        The module POD is not the only place where your repo must be linked. The most important place is the distribution metadata: the resources section of META.{yaml,json}

        This is important because the metadata can be processed by programs while the POD is only for humans.

      We can not rely only on the source repository of the author to get the original source. First, too few authors advertise the place of that repository in their metadata. Then, the author may decide to make it private, or delete it completely. Look at what happened to Marcel Grunauer 200+ modules when he dropped his Github account in August 2011...

      The only reliable archive is the CPAN. This is where the source must be.

      This is why I hate tools that transform the original source : PodWeaver, Dist::Zilla::Plugin::ExtraTests...

Re^3: What are the files in a CPAN distribution?
by cavac (Chaplain) on Feb 04, 2013 at 13:09 UTC

    and think it's ok to distribute the /xt directory (or author-only tests)

    I agree. Even if the tests are never run by someone else, they might still prove a valuable resource to another author. And if (somewhat unexpectedly cause my code is always perfect) bug reports start flooding in, it is always a good thing to have all existing tests for the distribution already deployed. It's much easier to ask a user to "just run this command(s) and post the output" than first having to haggle about how to send the test scripts and set up the test environment.

    "I know what i'm doing! Look, what could possibly go wrong? All i have to pull this lever like so, and then press this button here like ArghhhhhaaAaAAAaaagraaaAAaa!!!"

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1009610]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-08-01 17:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Who would be the most fun to work for?















    Results (33 votes), past polls