Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re^3: why the array index has to start at 0??

by roboticus (Chancellor)
on Dec 21, 2012 at 16:32 UTC ( #1009934=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: why the array index has to start at 0??
in thread why the array index has to start at 0??


I don't think it's silly, rather it just moves the question a bit. As you indicate, the question is merely moved to "which is the better way of expressing a range". It seems that Djikstra prefers "0 <= i < N" to "1<= i < N+1". However, he doesn't say why that's any better. I agree that it looks better, but there's another formulation "0 < i <= N" that looks just as good. Why isn't that just as good? He leaves the question open.


When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.

  • Comment on Re^3: why the array index has to start at 0??

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1009934]
[stevieb]: been thinking... if it wasn't for Perl, I believe that I'd be done in tech. I don't do social media or the like, if I'm not coding I'm not on a device at all, and don't miss comms at all when I'm not around. I code for my job (which I like), but I think..
[stevieb]: ...I haven't coughed up my laptop because of Perl.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (2)
As of 2017-03-29 02:06 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (343 votes). Check out past polls.