Re^2: using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach

in reply to Re: using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach
in thread using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach

You are probably right, but I can't touch foo at the moment... It stands for a number of objects' methods that I cannot change. I am given this deck of cards, and deal with it... I guess that for the sake of simplicity, brevity (and less duration of memory footprint), I'll use the anonymous array method.

Comment on Re^2: using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54 UTC
for the sake of simplicity, brevity (and less duration of memory footprint), I'll use the anonymous array method. Neither of your OP snippets uses an anonymous array. Your function returns a list, which you either: assign to an array which you then process using for; or you process the list directly with for. But yes, there is no purpose to assigning to the array, unless you needed to retain the returned values beyond the loop. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: using function output ananymous array vs. named array in foreach
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54 UTC

for the sake of simplicity, brevity (and less duration of memory footprint), I'll use the anonymous array method.

Neither of your OP snippets uses an anonymous array.

Your function returns a list, which you either: assign to an array which you then process using for; or you process the list directly with for.

But yes, there is no purpose to assigning to the array, unless you needed to retain the returned values beyond the loop.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom