Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

by gideondsouza (Pilgrim)
on Jan 19, 2013 at 13:51 UTC ( #1014211=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
in thread is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Thanks a lot for your explanation. I really appreciate it :)

Sub::Name, on cpan has a 4 open bugs, I looked through them and I'm assuming that it should be ok to use it if I were distributing my wrapper as a module?


Comment on Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
Re^5: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
by tobyink (Abbot) on Jan 19, 2013 at 18:45 UTC

    Obviously it's up to you to judge whether it's suitably stable, but Moose and DBIx::Class both use Sub::Name, so personally I'd consider it to be pretty reliable.

    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

      Thanks. That more than convinces me

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1014211]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (15)
As of 2015-07-02 18:59 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (44 votes), past polls