Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

by gideondsouza (Pilgrim)
on Jan 19, 2013 at 13:51 UTC ( #1014211=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
in thread is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Thanks a lot for your explanation. I really appreciate it :)

Sub::Name, on cpan has a 4 open bugs, I looked through them and I'm assuming that it should be ok to use it if I were distributing my wrapper as a module?


Comment on Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
Re^5: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
by tobyink (Abbot) on Jan 19, 2013 at 18:45 UTC

    Obviously it's up to you to judge whether it's suitably stable, but Moose and DBIx::Class both use Sub::Name, so personally I'd consider it to be pretty reliable.

    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

      Thanks. That more than convinces me

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1014211]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-11-28 07:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (193 votes), past polls