Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

by tobyink (Abbot)
on Jan 19, 2013 at 18:45 UTC ( #1014230=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
in thread is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Obviously it's up to you to judge whether it's suitably stable, but Moose and DBIx::Class both use Sub::Name, so personally I'd consider it to be pretty reliable.

perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'
  • Comment on Re^5: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: is my api wrapper abstraction ok (is it perlish?)
by gideondsouza (Pilgrim) on Jan 20, 2013 at 05:25 UTC

    Thanks. That more than convinces me

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1014230]
help
Chatterbox?
[choroba]: I'm curious which part of your signature do they find offensive.
[LanX]: they?
[LanX]: click!
[choroba]: they
[LanX]: why do you think it's more than one person?
[Your Mother]: Because we are LEGION! Fix YOUR SIG SIG BLOCK!!!!
[Your Mother]: Forgot to sign in as my sockpuppet, how embarrassing!
[1nickt]: pryrt I am creating a Type to check valid user IDs, which must be a whole number greater than or equal to zero. I would like to disallow 1.0 but because of this behaviour, by the time it is checked by the constraint, it *is* an Int.
[LanX]: should this be considered? Re: Parsing .txt into arrays

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (15)
As of 2017-05-24 20:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?