"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Regex re_eval - requires explicit package nameby Anonymous Monk |
on Jan 20, 2013 at 10:50 UTC ( [id://1014282]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Should I consider this a bug? I think probably not, I vaguely recall that with this experimental feature, you're supposed to use dynamic/local vars instead of lexical/my vars update: Re: (??{ code }) versus (?PARNO) for recursive regular expressions (lexicals won't stay shared ), Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }), (??{ lexical variable }), Scoping issues with code evaluation asserstions?
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|