Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator

by ted.byers (Monk)
on Feb 01, 2013 at 01:33 UTC ( #1016420=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator
in thread Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator

Thanks

I gave that a try, but alas, it didn't change anything. I still get the same error.

Thanks anyway.

Ted

  • Comment on Re^2: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator
by roboticus (Chancellor) on Feb 01, 2013 at 02:05 UTC

    ted.byers:

    Have you looked at the tests for the module? You can use the test "t/multiple_constraints.t" as an example and build on it to find out how to use multiple constraints.

    ...roboticus

    When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.

      I had not, but now I have. Here is the example there:

      my %data = ( multiple => 'to fail', #multiple => [qw{this multi-value input will fail on the constraint +below}], single => 'to pass', ); my %profile = ( required => [qw/ multiple single /], constraints => { multiple => [ { name => 'constraint_1', constraint => qr/\w/ }, # pass { name => 'constraint_2', constraint => qr/\d/ }, # force fail + ], }, ); my $results = Data::FormValidator->check(\%data, \%profile);

      The only difference, apart from using a regular expression, I see there is that they have the field name where the example from the documentation, and I, have a dummy nme, and where I, and the documentation, have the filed name as the first value in the array, the test does not. But, When I modify my code to resemble the code in that test, I still get the same error.

      This is so frustrating.

      Thanks

      Ted

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1016420]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: Corion are you would able to realize such thing? O_O
[Corion]: In the same vein I have a script that automates Firefox to enter some data into another system. It's not faster than the people using the script if they were to do it manually, but they prefer not having to check the data and not having typos when ...
[Corion]: ... entering the data
[Corion]: Discipulus: I don't know whether I could really do that, but the init process itself mostly launches other processes, and the whole startup is just following a path of dependencies and making sure they are all running. Which basically is what ...
[Discipulus]: when at work my time is (temporarly) owned by the firm, so i do not care (coworkers whatch movies.. I code Perl)
[Corion]: ... make already does, except for files instead of programs. But maybe with some /proc hackery, that could be eliminated and one could use plain make :-D
[choroba]: systemd just makes is asynchronous
[choroba]: so, make -j
[Corion]: Discipulus: Yeah - but when writing Perl to save time (instead of having fun), it helps to look whether you're actually saving time ;) Why spend 5 minutes doing manually what you can spend three years automating? ;)
[Corion]: choroba: Oh, yeah :-D

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-07-27 09:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I came, I saw, I ...
























    Results (408 votes). Check out past polls.