Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator

by roboticus (Canon)
on Feb 01, 2013 at 02:05 UTC ( #1016421=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator
in thread Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator

ted.byers:

Have you looked at the tests for the module? You can use the test "t/multiple_constraints.t" as an example and build on it to find out how to use multiple constraints.

...roboticus

When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.


Comment on Re^3: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator
Re^4: Problems with not so trivial data validation using Data::FormValidator
by ted.byers (Scribe) on Feb 01, 2013 at 02:49 UTC

    I had not, but now I have. Here is the example there:

    my %data = ( multiple => 'to fail', #multiple => [qw{this multi-value input will fail on the constraint +below}], single => 'to pass', ); my %profile = ( required => [qw/ multiple single /], constraints => { multiple => [ { name => 'constraint_1', constraint => qr/\w/ }, # pass { name => 'constraint_2', constraint => qr/\d/ }, # force fail + ], }, ); my $results = Data::FormValidator->check(\%data, \%profile);

    The only difference, apart from using a regular expression, I see there is that they have the field name where the example from the documentation, and I, have a dummy nme, and where I, and the documentation, have the filed name as the first value in the array, the test does not. But, When I modify my code to resemble the code in that test, I still get the same error.

    This is so frustrating.

    Thanks

    Ted

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1016421]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-30 11:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (230 votes), past polls