Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Re^3: Perl bug ?

by tinita (Parson)
on Feb 06, 2013 at 12:31 UTC ( #1017405=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Perl bug ?
in thread Perl bug ?

the first call of ok():
the first argument is $errors && ($errors->[0] =~ /.../i) which results in $errors being passed as the first argument. before it is passed, array element 0 gets autovivivied though by usage in the second argument.

the second call:
$errors is now true, so the matching is executed and its result would the empty string ("false"). but since the matching is executed in list context, the result is an empty list, so what you wrote as a second argument becomes now the first argument.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Perl bug ?
by vsespb (Chaplain) on Feb 06, 2013 at 12:36 UTC
    Why I have
    [[[ARRAY(0x137cd48)]]] [[[some text 1 ]]]
    then ? First argument should be true only if $errors->[0] contains string /Journal file not found/ no ?
      like I said. the first argument passed to ok() is $errors && ($errors->[0] =~ /.../i). what gets really passed is $errors. it's like saying: my @foo = $errors && ($errors->[0] =~ /.../i)
      the pattern match isn't executed at all at the first time. but after processing the first argument, you use $errors->[0] in your second argument. now $errors is autovivified to an array ref before ok() is actyally executed. since $errors is passed as the first argument as an alias, it prints ARRAY(0x137cd48)
        what gets really passed is $errors
        Why? I would expect the result of the && operation to be passed.
        لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1017405]
[Mr. Muskrat]: (considered) Re^3: Please help with Regexp::Common needs to be reparented to Re^2: Please help with Regexp::Common
[Mr. Muskrat]: Is it just me or does that timeout issue seems to be happening more often lately?
[Corion]: Mr. Muskrat: I'm not sure if it really happens more often, but I don't exactly know either
[LanX]: yep
[LanX]: more often for some weeks now
[Corion]: I think I'll have to manually (as god) intervene with that node, as the simple reparenting didn't seem to fix the parent/child relationship of the nodes
[Corion]: I think I have an idea but I'll have to open a ticket with on that - hopefully I get to that on the weekend
LanX imagines a burning thorn bush
[Mr. Muskrat]: Thank you!
[Mr. Muskrat]: Oh that is odd. I got the message that it was reparented but yeah, it didn't actually do it. lol

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-01-19 16:24 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?

    Results (170 votes). Check out past polls.