Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: threads, file handles and wxPerl

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Feb 13, 2013 at 17:12 UTC ( [id://1018581]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: threads, file handles and wxPerl
in thread threads, file handles and wxPerl

Be careful. The file won't close until you close both handles; but you have to ensure than you do not close the first handle before the the thread has had a chance to clone it. You may need a shared var as a semaphore to coordinate things.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: threads, file handles and wxPerl
by sdetweil (Sexton) on Feb 13, 2013 at 17:27 UTC
    thank you. I added close $fh; after the write in the event handler. I am letting the thread ending close the open3() created handles cause they were declared as local(). Should I do that explicitly? (adding it didn't cause any issues);
      Should I do that explicitly?

      No. Implicit closing works fine. Where the issue arises is typified by this TCP server constuction:

      sub clientHandler { my( $fileno ) = shift; open my $client, ">&=$fileno" or die $!; while( <$client> ) { ...; } } while( my $client = $svr->accept ) { threads->create( \&clientHandler, fileno( $client ) ); }

      The problem is that will work much of the time, especially when testing under light loads, because the thread will succeed in running to the point when the client handle is duped, before the thread that spawned it reaches the end of the while loop and the original $client is auto-closed.

      But then when the program is used under moderately heavy loads, the spawning thread gets another timeslice before the spawned thread has chance to perform the dup, and by the time it does, the handle has been auto-closed and there is nothing to dup.

      It becomes necessary to add a semaphore to prevent the parent thread from reaching the end of the while loop before the child has duped the handle. Not especially difficult; but there are many ways to do it wrongly.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1018581]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2024-04-18 15:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found