Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot

Re^2: regex anchoring issue

by smls (Friar)
on Feb 15, 2013 at 11:23 UTC ( #1018879=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: regex anchoring issue
in thread regex anchoring issue

Why do you place the regex in a (?>...) non-backtracking group?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: regex anchoring issue
by kcott (Chancellor) on Feb 16, 2013 at 05:58 UTC

    Wrapping regexp alternations in (?>...) is something I do by default. While there may be rare cases where this might be problematical, I haven't encountered any: it's something that doesn't hurt and, indeed, often helps.

    This usage is based on a "Perl Best Practices" guideline: Backtracking (page 269). It's summarised on page 271 as:

    ... rewrite any instance of:

    X | Y


    (?> X | Y )

    While I'm not a slave to all "Perl Best Practices" guidelines, this is one I have found to be useful.

    Update: s/have encountered/haven't encountered/

    -- Ken

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1018879]
LanX thx Lanx
[shmem]: python sucks
[LanX]: keep your sexlife private, please!
[LanX]: ;-p
shmem spent 3 hours chasing a bug related to variable scoping
[shmem]: is there an equivalent to my in python? or 'use strict' ?
[LanX]: I doubt
[LanX]: only nonlocal in Py3

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2018-03-20 17:48 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (256 votes). Check out past polls.