Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Using variable to hold regex expression

by AnomalousMonk (Abbot)
on Mar 12, 2013 at 00:35 UTC ( #1022906=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Using variable to hold regex expression
in thread Using variable to hold regex expression

... how to parse a string which has repetitive data ...

As choroba pointed out, every  (pattern) pair of parentheses in a regex captures something (even undef possibly) to its corresponding capture variable. One way to parse a string using nested regexes is avoid using a gazillion capturing groups. Use the non-capturing  (?:pattern) instead for grouping. See perlre, perlrequick, perlretut. In the IP example (but this should generalize to any repetitive data you wish to extract):

>perl -wMstrict -le "my $decimal_octet = qr{ 2 (?: [0-4] \d | 5 [0-5]) | [01]? \d? \d }xms; my $ip = qr{ (?<! \d) $decimal_octet (?: \. $decimal_octet){3} (?! \d) }xms; print $ip; ;; my $s = '123.45.6.234 xx yyy zz 000.12.34.255'; my @ips = $s =~ m{ $ip }xmsg; printf qq{'$_' } for @ips; " (?^msx: (?<! \d) (?^msx: 2 (?: [0-4] \d | 5 [0-5]) | [01]? \d? \d ) (? +: \. (?^msx: 2 (?: [0-4] \d | 5 [0-5]) | [01]? \d? \d )){3} (?! \d) ) '123.45.6.234' '000.12.34.255'

Note that neither  (?:pattern) nor the  (?<!pattern) (?!pattern) look-around assertions capture. Indeed, nothing captures (to a capture variable) since data is extracted in list context directly to an array.


Comment on Re^3: Using variable to hold regex expression
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1022906]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-02 05:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (29 votes), past polls