Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...

by Your Mother (Chancellor)
on Mar 12, 2013 at 18:32 UTC ( #1023032=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...
in thread SQLite vs Firebird vs ...

SQLite really sucks "SQL-wise".

SQLite rules for what it is: an utterly free, stable, embeddable, minimalistic engine. Saying it sucks because it doesn't match your use case is like saying a saw sucks because it won't drive nails well.


Comment on Re^3: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: SQLite vs Firebird vs ...
by sedusedan (Monk) on Mar 13, 2013 at 03:00 UTC
    I was actually saying "SQLite's SQL features sucks (as in: are lacking)". To be more specific: no dates, very limited ALTER TABLE. Is that more objective now? (Although now that I think of it, those two lacking features are crippling *for my use cases*, others might not be bothered with that).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1023032]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-29 07:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls