Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Improve Perl's marketing position by making Perlmonks more discoverable for automated "popularity contests"

by mithaldu (Monk)
on Mar 16, 2013 at 00:43 UTC ( #1023797=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Improve Perl's marketing position by making Perlmonks more discoverable for automated "popularity contests"
in thread Improve Perl's marketing position by making Perlmonks more discoverable for automated "popularity contests"

A way to justify this (at least to me) is that it's an obviously true statement. This could just be seen as a clarification, almost like going towards Semantic Web -- using the correct tags/keywords.

That is not just a justification, that is entirely my intent. :)


Comment on Re^2: Improve Perl's marketing position by making Perlmonks more discoverable for automated "popularity contests"
Re^3: Improve Perl's marketing position by making Perlmonks more discoverable for automated "popularity contests"
by igelkott (Curate) on Mar 16, 2013 at 23:54 UTC
    justification

    "Justification" as a way to overcome doubts. Would be more fair to say "a different way to look at this" with the implication that the positive outweighs the negative.

      I was trying to express that in my mind there were ZERO doubts about this. A flawed, but stable algorithm is hurting us. We can either complain about it, or figure out what we can do to make the algorithm do the right thing. Once that is understood there should not be a doubt in any person's mind. :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1023797]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-07-29 13:50 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (217 votes), past polls