Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

by Ratazong (Prior)
on Mar 18, 2013 at 14:37 UTC ( #1024069=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

On November 30th, 2011 you posted this node, proposing removing the anonymous monk. That proposal has been rejected by the majority of the monks. You can see this by the replies and by the reputation of that node. What makes you think that the general opinion on the topic has changed since then? (At least mine hasn't ... .)

Proposing the same again and again without a new situation or new facts doesn't look helpful to me.

Rata


Comment on Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1024069]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-29 08:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (261 votes), past polls