Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

by Ratazong (Prior)
on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:03 UTC ( #1024160=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?
in thread Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

Ooh, cool ... eight downvotes and counting!

You cannot be surprised by that. You are a member of this site long enough, and you know the rules. A downvote is a valid way for a monk to express the discontent with a proposed idea. See here: How should I spend my votes? -- General Voting Guidelines. In fact, downvoting you post is a way to treat your post seriously, however to come to a different conclusion than you do. So you should lighten up.

And it is of course no record. The worst node today is this - and with a good reason.

Have a nice day!

Rata


Comment on Re^2: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1024160]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-10-20 13:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (76 votes), past polls