Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Pointer to a structure in Perl

by sundialsvc4 (Monsignor)
on Apr 01, 2013 at 19:08 UTC ( #1026533=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Pointer to a structure in Perl

Indeed, the secret-sauce that you are looking for here is “references.”

The concept here is several levels above the concept that you see in “C,” this being of course the language in which Perl was implemented.   A reference is, if you want to think of it this way, “a pointer to” a complete, self-describing Thing, that is also well-known to the Perl interpreter and fully part of the environment that it creates.   Perl can look at a reference , and know everything that needs to be known about what it refers to.   It knows how many references currently exist to that same thing, therefore it knows whether-or-not that object is eligible to be garbage-collected.   The Perl language does not have the concept of a “structure,” in the C/C++ sense, but it does have the concept of a list, array, and hash.

The environment that has been created by the Perl interpreter is intended to focus upon providing an efficient solution to the same problem that one might use “pointers to structures” in bare-bones C to address, but to do so in a way that is much less reliant upon the program-in-question to “do everything in just the right way, or else.”   There exist several layers of well-tested software that any Perl programmer can rely upon the existence of, that a C-programmer cannot.   All of us here fully-understand both environments.


Comment on Re: Pointer to a structure in Perl

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1026533]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-01 01:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (256 votes), past polls