note
BrowserUk
<blockquote><i>I think I understood you. Please correct me where I have not.</i></blockquote>
<p>Stated more simply, you inferred sexism where it could not exist and without consultation voiced that unfounded charge in a public forum.
<p>Later in the thread you inferred homophobia and voiced the charge, again without foundation, publicly.
<p>Those two combined open up a third possibility, defined in European and other legal doctrines as 'hate mongering'.
<p>I strongly suggest that you stop now and seek both salient education and appropriate legal advice.
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-171588">
<hr />
<font size=1 >
<div>With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'</div>
<div>Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.</div>
<div>"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". </div>
<div>In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
</div>
</font>
</div></div>
1026502
1028062