Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?

Re: Downvoting Dilemma

by adamsj (Hermit)
on Aug 08, 2001 at 21:13 UTC ( #103124=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Downvoting Dilemma

I'm not very concerned with changes 1 or 3, but I think 2 is overcomplicated. I'd rather see a straight "one downvote equals one XP lost by the caster". A downvote is different from an upvote in obvious ways--in particular, unlike an upvote, a downvote can be cast maliciously. So my feeling is that if someone feels strongly enough about a node to downvote it, then let them put their, their XP...where their mouth is.

Update: In response to Masem's comment below, let me note that using votebots to upvote a central account is improper but not malicious. There's a limit to what can be done, and I'm in favor of doing what can be done to restrict malicious behavior directed at individuals without unreasonably restricting what the general population can do. I'm also inclined to think that discouraging quick reaping of nodes is a Good Thing.

I do agree that downvotes aren't inherently malicious.

I also think it's odd that we tell people to just shrug it off when they're hit with massive XP loss through snipering but balk at a single XP-- for voluntary action--even if it's in the public good, sometimes you have to pay for it.


They laughed at Joan of Arc, but she went right ahead and built it. --Gracie Allen

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Downvoting Dilemma
by Masem (Monsignor) on Aug 08, 2001 at 21:35 UTC
    But you can also use upvotes maliciously too; if one had several low-level accounts that upvoted anything on a main account, it's just as bad as votebots downvoting someone else.

    In addition, there's times where a downvote is not being used maliciously; one example is to help prevent flames and derogatory posts from the site. In this case, the voter that helps to downvote and invoke nodereaper is doing the site a favor, and should not be punished for it.

    I don't think that beyond trying to find votebots and remove them, there's much that can be done to improve the downvoting problem. At least, through modification of the moderation system without hurting other parts of it that already work well.

    Dr. Michael K. Neylon - || "You've left the lens cap of your mind on again, Pinky" - The Brain

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://103124]
[stevieb]: I advised the OP that a possible workaround would be to add a version function/flag that displays the required copyright/license info instead
[Marshall]: Darn! I'll look at the thread. Must not be updatinga byte count somewhere. The .exe format is a complex critter.
[stevieb]: that way, it's still "hard coded" into the exe at least, despite not being visible via Properties
[Marshall]: I also looked into PerlApp from Active State, but they don't sell their Dev Kit independent of a very expensive ($1,200) per year license anymore.
[Corion]: I would assume that the PE format hasn't changed that much since the days of yore, but it seems that I would be wrong in that assumption
[Marshall]: When I bought my copy 15+ years ago, it was just a couple hundred bucks.
[Marshall]: I looked at MS specs for PE format and I didn't see any changes in last decade, but evidenly that would be wrong.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-12-08 18:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:

    Results (144 votes). Check out past polls.