Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?

by Anonymous Monk
on May 19, 2013 at 03:43 UTC ( #1034188=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?
in thread How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?

FWIW, I am the OP, and this was a (part of a) bug that was fixed, see http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/Changes, Bug #80276 for Module-ScanDeps: Module DateTime::Format::ISO8601 generates error after being packaged

It now runs pretty fast :)

$ perl -le " print ~~gmtime " Sun May 19 03:37:08 2013 $ pp -e " use strict; use warnings; use Getopt::Long; use DateTime::Fo +rmat::ISO8601; print qq{$_\n} for %INC; " $ perl -le " print ~~gmtime " Sun May 19 03:37:24 2013

This is with PAR Packager, version 1.014 (PAR version 1.007) and Module::Scandeps 1.10

So if you're experiencing slowdown, upgrade :)


Comment on Re^5: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1034188]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (14)
As of 2015-07-29 13:50 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (263 votes), past polls