Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: useful depth of sub routines

by JockoHelios (Scribe)
on May 28, 2013 at 16:12 UTC ( #1035641=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: useful depth of sub routines
in thread useful depth of sub routines

Up to now, using the subroutine-specific variable names has made it easier for me to keep track of what's happening to which variable at what point in the program.

But at this point I only have a dozen or so subroutines. I see your point - this could get hairy as that number increases. I'll eventually have to keep track of the initials of the subroutine names, to keep the variable prefixes unique. Hoo, boy.

Dyslexics Untie !!!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1035641]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: r@j: Have you printed what '$Process_java' prints? How will Perl know that you mean a variable named $Process and not a variable named $Process_java? Also, why doesn't Perl complain when you're using strict in your program?
[erix]: thanos1983: s/ For login purposes / For logging purposes / # I suppose ...
[r@j]: Actully $Process_Java this is getting from config file

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-10-23 15:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

















    Results (280 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?