Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Thank You Monks!

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Jun 02, 2013 at 17:38 UTC ( #1036606=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Thank You Monks!

I am sure that, if you hang here long enough, you will in due time hear both.   But, no seriously, this is by-and-large a very helpful and civilized community that is quick to help and generally slow to RTFM if presented with a question that can be answered.   Good to know that we’re collectively doing the right thing for you ... and we look forward to your participation in answering questions, soon.   Welcome Aboard.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1036606]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: Meh. I get the feeling I should post a call-to-action for people to test their modules with the upcoming 5.26 (or 5.25.latest), as it seems that the smoke testers don't really weed out modules that fail without . in @INC
[Corion]: But without instructions on how to easily test things yourself, I don't think such a call to arms is helpful
[Corion]: (this post on nntp.perl.org / p5p makes it seem to me that smoke testers seem to have a blind spot there)
[Corion]: Hmmm. Maybe setting $ENV{PERL5LIB}=" some path without dot"; perl Makefile.PL; make test already is enough to locally test your module...
[Corion]: Meh, no, will need a BEGIN hook...
[Corion]: ... and PERL5OPT does not like -e in it :-(
[Corion]: Ah. The magic invocation is set PERL5OPT=-M-lib=. (equivalent of no lib '.';
[Corion]: )

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-03-27 08:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (317 votes). Check out past polls.