Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .

by Ralesk (Pilgrim)
on Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14 UTC ( #1038429=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Thoughts on replacing -> with .

A very definite no from me too.

I agree with most points brought up above, especially the cognitive burden one and the havoc of ~= versus =~.


Comment on Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
Select or Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
by Corion (Pope) on Jun 12, 2013 at 11:19 UTC

    Note that =~ and ~= are both valid Perl already.

      Hmm, I don’t see ~= in perlop; and ~ is the unary bitwise negation operator, so it wouldn’t make much sense to have ~=. What is it?

        It is like += and .=, which modify the left-hand side by the right hand side.

        $a += $b adds the right hand side ($b) to the left hand side, $a, and assigns the result to $a.

        $a .= $b appends $b to $a and assigns the result to $a.

        $a ~= $b xor's $b and $a and assigns the result to $a.

        As this is a relatively uncommon use, it maybe makes this interchange currently even harder to spot than later the use of =~ and ~=.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1038429]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-29 02:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls