in reply to
Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
in thread Thoughts on replacing -> with .
Note that =~ and ~= are both valid Perl already.
Hmm, I don’t see ~= in perlop; and ~ is the unary bitwise negation operator, so it wouldn’t make much sense to have ~=. What is it?
It is like += and .=, which modify the left-hand side by the right hand side.
$a += $b adds the right hand side ($b) to the left hand side, $a, and assigns the result to $a.
$a .= $b appends $b to $a and assigns the result to $a.
$a ~= $b xor's $b and $a and assigns the result to $a.
As this is a relatively uncommon use, it maybe makes this interchange currently even harder to spot than later the use of =~ and ~=.
$a ~= $b
But XOR-assign is supposed to be $a ^= $b...
Priority 1, Priority 2, Priority 3
Priority 1, Priority 0, Priority -1
Urgent, important, favour
Data loss, bug, enhancement
Out of scope, out of budget, out of line
Family, friends, work
Impossible, inconceivable, implemented
Results (29 votes),