in reply to
Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
in thread Thoughts on replacing -> with .
Note that =~ and ~= are both valid Perl already.
Hmm, I don’t see ~= in perlop; and ~ is the unary bitwise negation operator, so it wouldn’t make much sense to have ~=. What is it?
It is like += and .=, which modify the left-hand side by the right hand side.
$a += $b adds the right hand side ($b) to the left hand side, $a, and assigns the result to $a.
$a .= $b appends $b to $a and assigns the result to $a.
$a ~= $b xor's $b and $a and assigns the result to $a.
As this is a relatively uncommon use, it maybe makes this interchange currently even harder to spot than later the use of =~ and ~=.
But XOR-assign is supposed to be $a ^= $b...
$a ~= $b
A Programming Language, 1962
Programming the 1900 series in COBOL, 1974
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs, 1976
The C Programming Language, 1978
System V - Interface definition, 1986
Z80 Assembly Language Programming, 1979
TheSOURCE User's Manual, 1979
The C Primer, 1983
Interactive Fortran 77, A Hands on Approach, 1984
Perl.1 man page, 1991
Results (350 votes),