in reply to
Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
in thread Thoughts on replacing -> with .
Note that =~ and ~= are both valid Perl already.
Hmm, I don’t see ~= in perlop; and ~ is the unary bitwise negation operator, so it wouldn’t make much sense to have ~=. What is it?
It is like += and .=, which modify the left-hand side by the right hand side.
$a += $b adds the right hand side ($b) to the left hand side, $a, and assigns the result to $a.
$a .= $b appends $b to $a and assigns the result to $a.
$a ~= $b xor's $b and $a and assigns the result to $a.
As this is a relatively uncommon use, it maybe makes this interchange currently even harder to spot than later the use of =~ and ~=.
$a ~= $b
But XOR-assign is supposed to be $a ^= $b...
shiny regexes and rules offered by Perl 6
other CPAN module
by looking at it on my monitor
I print it and I read it in spare time
first I convert it into $FORMAT, then I parse it
I hire someone to do it
using my custom module
I write a brand new language to do the task
on the server where I play as human, XML is forbidden
what is XML?
I speak XML natively
I write a new grammar for Perl 6
some other way
Results (418 votes),