|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re^3: Simple regex question. Grouping with a negative lookahead assertion.by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jul 14, 2013 at 06:36 UTC||Need Help??|
I was also trying to prevent any characters that were not in the following character class, [acgt], from being included in the match.
Is that a possibility? If so, then substitute that for . in my regex. (S'not rocket science.)
But, if it is a possibility, then you could (should) have included a non-acgt character in your example.
And if the example you provided is realistic, then using [acgt] is redundant, because your example consists entirely of those characters.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.