Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Recursive locks:killer application. Do they have one? (mu)

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jul 16, 2013 at 06:13 UTC ( #1044514=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Recursive locks:killer application. Do they have one? (mu)
in thread Recursive locks:killer application. Do they have one?

I find it hard to imagine how "need to count" can have more than the most trivial of impacts on the efficiency of a mutex.

Independent proof Suck it!

You are almost as bad as sundialsvc4; unfortunately, getting enough monks around here to recognise it is going to be an awful lot harder.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re^4: Recursive locks:killer application. Do they have one? (mu)
Re^5: Recursive locks:killer application. Do they have one? (mu)
by tye (Cardinal) on Jul 16, 2013 at 13:49 UTC

    Too bad that your link doesn't actually contradict my point.

    The need to hit the kernel is not "the need to count".

    - tye        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1044514]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-09-20 16:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (160 votes), past polls