|No such thing as a small change|
Re^9: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jul 22, 2013 at 15:38 UTC||Need Help??|
An ADS cannot exist without a main file; and unlinking the main file will always delete the ADS; so I'm not sure what you are getting at here?
I asked the question on the sqlite mailing list; but besides getting the obvious reply -- "if the data persists it isn't an in-memory db"; Well d'uh! -- total silence. Probably there is noone with any windows knowledge on the list.
My suspicion is:
Another possibility is that using threads and multiple handles to an in-memory db in conjunction with DBI's broken threading semantics is preventing the clean-up code being invoked.
I'm not sure where else to go looking for knowledgeable sqlite+windows devs?
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.