Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Aug 15, 2013 at 17:41 UTC ( #1049632=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

There are no backwards compatibility concerns. This syntax was a syntax error in earlier versions of Perl. Code written for those older versions will continue to work with no changes.

With that said, this feature interacts poorly with the much more useful 5.12 feature of using each on arrays. I pretend autodereferencing doesn't exist.


Comment on Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1049632]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-08-29 04:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (275 votes), past polls