Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Aug 15, 2013 at 17:41 UTC ( #1049632=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

There are no backwards compatibility concerns. This syntax was a syntax error in earlier versions of Perl. Code written for those older versions will continue to work with no changes.

With that said, this feature interacts poorly with the much more useful 5.12 feature of using each on arrays. I pretend autodereferencing doesn't exist.


Comment on Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1049632]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-07-14 02:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (254 votes), past polls