Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

by boftx (Deacon)
on Aug 24, 2013 at 05:01 UTC ( [id://1050758]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

After reading the replies I am convinced that the proper course of action when writing code that might find its way to CPAN is to adhere to the lowest version of Perl that one is still likely to find in common use. At this point in time that is possibly 5.8.x but arguably 5.10.x might be a reasonable cutoff. (I am not aware of any major hosting provider that still has 5.8.x for a system perl at this time, but ...)

That being said, it should be obvious that when one is writing code that will be used in a private environment where there is full control over which perl is to be used then one should take full advantage of the features that allow for a better product. The question in my OP was aimed at those of us who on occasion (or regularly) contribute to CPAN in the hopes of making life a little bit easier for someone else as a way of saying "Thank you" to those who have gone before us.

Thank you all for your contributions to this discussion.

  • Comment on Re: Is auto-dereferencing worth forcing upgrades to newer versions of Perl?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1050758]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-23 21:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found