Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Stop suggesting to upgrade perl

by Tux (Monsignor)
on Sep 03, 2013 at 11:42 UTC ( #1052085=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Stop suggesting to upgrade perl
in thread Stop suggesting to upgrade perl

But increased readability increases maintainability. IMHO the equivalence of

sub fexists (-f $_[0] ? $_[0] : undef); my $file = fexists ($p) // fexists ("$p.exe") // fexists ("$p.sh") // +;

would involve lexical copies and a huge chain of defined ($x) ternaries.

So yes, many new features were doable in older versions, but they were ugly and error-prone.

I myself do NOT like OO programming. I need to understand how perl does it when dealing with modules that have no non-OO alternative, like DBI and Tk, but I still prefer to program non-OO myself. Moose however makes the threshold to actually *use* OO in perl in a way that does not constantly irritate me a lot lower (if it does take away the threshold at all). That on itself is worth considering, as that also makes the language more open to newcommers. OO-programmers get a head-start with Moose over the available OO techniques that the CORE has available.


Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn


Comment on Re^5: Stop suggesting to upgrade perl
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1052085]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-29 08:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (185 votes), past polls