|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re^2: Who gave (and continues to give) Tye McQueen his authority for his autocratic domination of PerlMonks?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 04, 2013 at 06:58 UTC||Need Help??|
And if people believe a god temporarily banned your account you have significantly weakened your position, because who will risk an even lengthier ban by joining your crusade?
Really. I think whomever saw fit to -- silently, unilaterally, and with neither warning nor announcement -- ban my account, made my point for me better than I ever could have hoped for.
Will anything come of it? That's not up to me, I did my part. It would require collective action to change things, and there seems to be apathy for that.
So I'll accept the conclusion of democratic apathy, shut-the-f***-up, and live with the status quo.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.