|No such thing as a small change|
Re^11: The implementation of SIGHUP in Win32 Perl (non-synchronous IO )by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 11, 2013 at 23:25 UTC||Need Help??|
But that is in C, the Anon I assume, and I was referring to XS
Sorry, but I fail to see the distinction between "C" and "XS". They are one and the same.
Would I even attempt it via Win32::API, and 'pure perl' (that's ironic) -- given the history of failures with Win32::API and callbacks, even before you introduce the idea of those callbacks be invoked by the system at some random point in the future possibly on a completely different thread -- no.
Before you try and shoot me down in flames; read the entirety (all 26 levels) of Perl crash during perl_clone so that you understand that I understand the requirements and problems of asynchronous, cross-thread callbacks very, very well.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.