Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: I want you to convince me to learn Perl

by Tux (Monsignor)
on Sep 25, 2013 at 12:11 UTC ( #1055670=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: I want you to convince me to learn Perl
in thread I want you to convince me to learn Perl

Writing perl^W^WEfficiently writing in perl in fact is so effective that I(/you) will take the speed issue for granted when most of what you write is for one-time use or for use that doesn't require the speed. I write perl and C and Java everyday and curse at C and Java quite a lot for not allowing me to write «my $c = 1;» instead of «int c = 1;» or «private static long c = 1;» or whatever it takes for a local/lexical variable to get in scope.

I find myself write less and less C as I can do almost anything in perl, and write it over ten times as fast in code that is easier to maintain. Some projects however still need perl: the code cannot be shared by law and perl has no good code-hiding feature.

Defining a useful data model in C might be quite a challenge. The autovivication in perl is a joy compared to how to deal with data in C and - even worse - in Java.

Compared to C and Java, changing data-structures, return types etc is so much easier.

I never wrote anything in python. I however read a lot of python scripts, mainly to fix bugs. I've read enough not to like it. Ruby on the other hand really looked as a good alternative when I would require a good OO scripting language. Python has - in the past - quite often said that they do not suffer from version incompatibilities, but to be honest, that is completely untrue: they suffer just as bad as any other (scripting) language. Most reasons for digging in python where just because of that.


Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn


Comment on Re^2: I want you to convince me to learn Perl
Re^3: I want you to convince me to learn Perl
by Marshall (Prior) on Sep 25, 2013 at 14:19 UTC
    I find myself write less and less C as I can do almost anything in perl, and write it over ten times as fast in code that is easier to maintain. Some projects however still need perl: the code cannot be shared by law and perl has no good code-hiding feature.
    I think that we are on the same page here.
    I am not so sure about the lack of a "code-hiding" feature.

    I use the Active-State Compiler and this thing is pretty hard to "decode". Many years ago, a massive power failure took out my Power Supply and 3 HD's. That trashed my Perl source code for one project, but not my .exe. The .exe code still runs over 5 years with no reported defects - so I am happy about that! If somebody can help me recover the source code, I would appreciate it. But I am skeptical. It is not as easy as one might think.

    I love Perl. A wonderful language.

    A new school quarter started Monday and I'm going to be working with an assembly class. I like it. Perl can kick butt vs this stuff except in very high performance situations.

      I assume you are referring to PerlApp by AS. Use a C debugger, set a breakpoint in eval_pv() or something similar (I dont remember anymore) (finding eval_pv in the process will be the painful part), once the AS decompresser/obfuscator decrypts it into memory, it will be passed as 1 big string to the perl5**.dll which will be in a temp dir somewhere on disk.

      The other choice is to RE the PerlApp obfuscator algorithm Re: Security, is it to much to ask?. Its been published a couple times in history, for example A real challenge and Decompile PerlApp but AS changes it constantly for obvious reasons.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1055670]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-07-22 13:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (113 votes), past polls