|Think about Loose Coupling|
Re^5: Why doesn't Perl provide %_ as the hash equivalent of @_ in subs? (ugly++)by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 27, 2013 at 10:53 UTC||Need Help??|
If it would make all function calls slower, then I agree with you that it wouldn't be worth it.
3 times slower...
hash could be built when first used... Would that not be technically feasible?
A good idea? Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.
And all to save you adding local %_ = @_; where you want it. Worth the effort? Absolutely not.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.