Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: RFC: "Nodes to consider" - sort contents?

by Anonymous Monk
on Sep 29, 2013 at 12:46 UTC ( #1056215=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RFC: "Nodes to consider" - sort contents?

Simply if enough people do it, consideration is not an onerous chore. I doubt it needs much if any re-coding, just more participation. "Consider considering..."

Comment on Re: RFC: "Nodes to consider" - sort contents?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: "Nodes to consider" - sort contents?
by wjw (Curate) on Sep 29, 2013 at 17:16 UTC
    I appreciate the point.

    Still, I stand by the suggestion I made.

    Thanks for the feedback!

    • ...the majority is always wrong, and always the last to know about it...
    • my will, and by will alone.. I set my mind in motion

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1056215]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-28 09:31 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...

    Results (254 votes), past polls