Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way

by remiah (Hermit)
on Oct 20, 2013 at 03:49 UTC ( #1058976=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way
in thread treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way

Hello kcott
I could get really deep responses with this thread.

I didn't notice that this is graph, until LanX said that, and your item and data are "adjacency list" with reference + count information. "item" is vertex which has reference to edge information,and "data" is edge data storage.

Your usage of reference: reference from "item" to "data" seems to me an essence I would like to use by myself...

I would like to have some more time to stick around this code, and thanks for your kind explanation.

regards


Comment on Re^2: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1058976]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-04 18:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (60 votes), past polls