Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^3: Arrays in arrays, how to access them

by viored (Novice)
on Oct 31, 2013 at 02:46 UTC ( #1060501=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Arrays in arrays, how to access them
in thread Arrays in arrays, how to access them

Ah, but if I use
subcall ( @{\@{$M[0]}} )
It works. Thank you so much, both of of you.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Arrays in arrays, how to access them
by AnomalousMonk (Chancellor) on Oct 31, 2013 at 07:06 UTC
    subcall( $M[0] );

    Assuming that  @M is initialized as shown in Re^2: Arrays in arrays, how to access them, you get, in this instance, an array reference passed to the  subcall() function because that's what element 0 of the  @M array is.

    subcall( \@{M[0]} )

    In this instance (assuming it's fixed to
        subcall( \@{$M[0]} )
    by adding the missing  $ sigil), you have, working from the inside out:

    • an array reference:  $M[0]
    • de-referenced to an array:  @{$M[0]}
    • to which a reference is taken:  \@{$M[0]}
    • this reference then being passed to a function:  subcall( \@{$M[0]} )
    In this instance, you're simply wrapping the access to  $M[0] in a redundant pair of complementary operations — and maybe in this case the compiler would even be smart enough to optimize away the redundancy! It's as if you had asked "Why do the two function calls
        func($x + 1729 - 137 - 1729 + 137);
    both pass the same value to the function?"

    Ah, but if I use
    subcall ( @{\@{$M[0]}} )

    If you use
        subcall ( @{\@{$M[0]}} )
    you extend the process of the second instance above to de-reference the array reference created (redundantly) by  \@{$M[0]} and pass an array (in the example, the  @a1 array) to the  subcall() function, which is apparently what it takes to make that function happy.

    >perl -wMstrict -le "my @a1 = qw(a b c); my @a2 = qw(p q r); my @a3 = qw(x y z); my @M = (\@a1, \@a2, \@a3); ;; print $M[0]; print \@{$M[0]}; ;; print 'array references are the same' if $M[0] == \@{$M[0]}; ;; print qq{-@{\@{$M[0]}}- -@{$M[0]}-}; " ARRAY(0x43281c) ARRAY(0x43281c) array references are the same -a b c- -a b c-

    (Also see perlreftut.)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1060501]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-08-16 22:10 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Who is your favorite scientist and why?

    Results (276 votes). Check out past polls.