Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Testing for valid package names

by tobyink (Abbot)
on Nov 25, 2013 at 21:56 UTC ( #1064315=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Testing for valid package names

Module::Runtime is probably what you want to use for this. Here are the relevant parts...

sub _is_string($) { my($arg) = @_; return defined($arg) && ref(\$arg) eq "SCALAR"; } our $module_name_rx = qr/[A-Z_a-z][0-9A-Z_a-z]*(?:::[0-9A-Z_a-z]+)*/; sub is_module_name($) { _is_string($_[0]) && $_[0] =~ /\A$module_name_rx\z/o; }

This is more restrictive than your current check - in particular it excludes all non-ASCII word characters. This is because Unicode file names are handled pretty inconsistently across different file systems and Perl versions.

Note that this is really a module name check; not a package name check. Modules are files on the filesystem; packages are namespaces. Package names are a lot more relaxed than module names; for example, the space character can be used as a package name:

perl -E'*{" ::foo"} = sub {42}; say " "->foo'
use Moops; class Cow :rw { has name => (default => 'Ermintrude') }; say Cow->new->name


Comment on Re: Testing for valid package names
Select or Download Code
Re^2: Testing for valid package names
by boftx (Deacon) on Nov 25, 2013 at 22:08 UTC

    Thanks! That was the regex I was coming up with, but seeing it in use is even better. And I hadn't considered the Unicode aspect. :)

    It helps to remember that the primary goal is to drain the swamp even when you are hip-deep in alligators.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1064315]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-07-05 09:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (61 votes), past polls