Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

by erix (Vicar)
on Jan 02, 2014 at 18:28 UTC ( #1069003=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

FWIW, to me it seems pointless.

  • Comment on Re: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 01:14 UTC

    FWIW, to me it seems pointless.

    How many writeups do you have? Can you imagine that some monks have 10,000 writeups? And participated in discussion threads with 10 other anonymous monks, and actually got confused by who was saying what unintentionally (no sock-puppetry, no trolling, legitimate discussion)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1069003]
help
Chatterbox?
and the questions are moot...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (6)
As of 2016-12-02 23:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (51 votes). Check out past polls.