Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

by taint (Chaplain)
on Jan 03, 2014 at 10:35 UTC ( #1069118=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
in thread Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Thank you for making my point.

In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that.
Have a nice day. :)

--Chris

λɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH


Comment on Re^3: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
Re^4: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 13:23 UTC

    Thank you for making my point. In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that. Have a nice day. :)

    How did I make your point? What does your point have to do with the proposal?

    How does "peer review" distinguish anonymous in a thread?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1069118]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-03 15:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (53 votes), past polls