Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

by taint (Chaplain)
on Jan 03, 2014 at 10:35 UTC ( #1069118=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
in thread Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Thank you for making my point.

In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that.
Have a nice day. :)

--Chris

λɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH


Comment on Re^3: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
Re^4: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 13:23 UTC

    Thank you for making my point. In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that. Have a nice day. :)

    How did I make your point? What does your point have to do with the proposal?

    How does "peer review" distinguish anonymous in a thread?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1069118]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-09-16 06:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite cookbook is:










    Results (157 votes), past polls