Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

by yitzchak (Sexton)
on Jan 06, 2014 at 01:11 UTC ( #1069439=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

None of the suggestions for taking away site functionality make sense to me, but there is one piece we are missing. When commenting/posting, a logged in user should be presented with a checkbox to post anonymously.


Comment on Re: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 06, 2014 at 02:07 UTC

    None of the suggestions for taking away site functionality make sense to me,

    What suggestions are those ?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1069439]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-12-22 23:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (133 votes), past polls