Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Interacting with the shell ( backticks, system(), open -| )

by afoken (Parson)
on Feb 06, 2014 at 19:19 UTC ( #1073751=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Interacting with the shell ( backticks, system(), open -| )
in thread Interacting with the shell ( backticks, system(), open -| )

How could I use File::Find and still keep the feature of the pipe into a filehandle, namely the while loop only reading in one line at a time? As with using backticks, the only way I can see is to read the entire output of File::Find into an array, which could be very large.

Do you know File::Find? If not, did you read the documentation?

My guess is that your answers are NO and NO, and the second one makes me sad.

File::Find has no output. File::Find uses a callback function (commonly called wanted) that is invoked exactly once for every file found. The loop that traverses the directory tree, the equivalent of the pipe open and the while / readline loop, is inside the File::Find::find funcion, so you don't need the while loop any more. The equivalent of the loop body is the callback function, this is where you process any file found by File::Find. You do not need an array.

Consult the really good documentation of File::Find for details.

Alexander

--
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)


Comment on Re^3: Interacting with the shell ( backticks, system(), open -| )
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1073751]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-26 07:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (168 votes), past polls