Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?

by Eily (Vicar)
on Mar 04, 2014 at 23:04 UTC ( #1076999=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?
in thread Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?

I may be mistaken, but I'm think that $c+=1 is actually defined to run the two steps one right after the other, while what is ambiguous in $c++ is the fact that $c will be incremented later.

I do agree on the fact that undefined behaviour does not mean undefined value, that's why it's hard to track.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1076999]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (13)
As of 2017-02-23 12:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Before electricity was invented, what was the Electric Eel called?






    Results (346 votes). Check out past polls.