Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?

by Eily (Hermit)
on Mar 04, 2014 at 23:04 UTC ( #1076999=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?
in thread Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?

I may be mistaken, but I'm think that $c+=1 is actually defined to run the two steps one right after the other, while what is ambiguous in $c++ is the fact that $c will be incremented later.

I do agree on the fact that undefined behaviour does not mean undefined value, that's why it's hard to track.


Comment on Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1076999]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-08-27 23:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (253 votes), past polls