Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Possible to have regexes act on file directly (not in memory)

by moritz (Cardinal)
on May 04, 2014 at 09:23 UTC ( #1084934=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Possible to have regexes act on file directly (not in memory)
in thread Possible to have regexes act on file directly (not in memory)

Thus, I first would need to know if the problem could be solved theoretically, ignoring runtime problems.

Theoretically, it's quite simple. A regex is compiled to a state machine; you can read a chunk of the file, run the regex against it, and if there is no match, simply read the next chunk of the file, and feed it to the same state machine without resetting it first.

The practical problem is that Perl doesn't expose an API that allows you to continue matching with the old state of the regex engine (as well as some optimizations that look at the length of the string, which you'd have to turn off).

So one possible approach is to write your own regex compiler (or reuse one) and teach the matcher to do incremental matches.

  • Comment on Re^2: Possible to have regexes act on file directly (not in memory)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1084934]
help
Chatterbox?
[ambrus]: ad code examples.
[ambrus]: I'm not trying to recommend PHP, but I think it has way too bad a name because of its past.
[ambrus]: This is different from MS Word, which was already a good editor in the pre-unicode days (in word for windows versions 2 and 6, which ran on windows 3 but also on windows 95), only it wasn't trying to solve the task of writing maths papers back then.
[Discipulus]: ah ok, sounds reasonable; with no fear: Perl all life long
[ambrus]: Mind you, LaTeX is currently still useful for writing math paper or snippet content without styling in such a way that the
[ambrus]: formatting conventions of a journal or website can be quickly applied to it, and MS Office and LibreOffice has not quite solved this (although it's better for this than it used to be),
[ambrus]: which is sort of a drawback compared to the ages of typewritten manuscripts representing content only to which the typesetter applies formatting, but that process required much more manual labor.
[ambrus]: If you want to typeset a manuscript, you can still do much less work then in the manual typesetting ages and get good formatting.
[ambrus]: All with only cheap modern computers and software.
[ambrus]: Something you can have at home and your corner print shop, without a whole printing press's worth of equipment.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-09-26 11:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (293 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?