Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

by GrandFather (Cardinal)
on Jun 05, 2014 at 20:06 UTC ( #1088907=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

The old/new major version sounds entirely sane to me. Version 1.x is available and is the approved version for old versions of Perl. It will get minimal love going forward. Version 2.x is the shiny new version tested against current versions of Perl back to say 5.10 (because that's when a lot of interesting stuff changed and there are probably still OSs around in maintenance mode with 5.10 as their system Perl).

It is a well understood and common practise that a major version bump may break stuff. It sounds like the changes you propose hardly warrant a mojor version bump because, apart from the exports change, they are pretty much internal. However the major version bump sends a pretty clear message that changes are afoot so watch out.

Perl is the programming world's equivalent of English


Comment on Re: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1088907]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-21 10:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (104 votes), past polls